Skip to main content
Registered Washington contractor · Written scope with clear exclusions
Free project review

Transparency

Dane Calloway and Our Editorial Standards

Foundation content is full of confident claims that nobody can check. This page explains who writes ours, how it is reviewed, and what we will not publish regardless of how well it would perform.

Author disclosure

Dane Calloway is an editorial pen name used by Seattle Foundation Repair. Technical reviewers and project contributors are credited separately.

Why a pen name, and what it does not mean

A single editorial voice keeps the tone and the standards consistent across a site that covers eleven services and dozens of technical topics. That is the only reason the name exists.

It does not stand for a licensed engineer, and we do not attach credentials or field experience to it. Where a page relies on someone's professional judgement, measurements, or site observations, those are attributed to the person responsible rather than absorbed into the byline. If you see a claim about what was measured at a property, there is a real person behind that measurement.

Sources we use

Technical facts come from primary sources. Local geology and landslide context come from the Washington Geological Survey and the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Permitting and critical-area requirements come from the reviewing jurisdiction, which is Seattle SDCI inside the city and a different authority everywhere else we work. Contractor registration and bond requirements come from Washington L&I.

Business claims come from our own records. When we cite a figure, we state the source, the date, the scope, and the units, and we distinguish sourced estimate ranges from completed-invoice figures. Permit valuations, where we discuss them at all, are labelled as declared permit values, they are not what a homeowner paid, and we will not title anything as if they were.

What we will not publish

  • Fear-based framing, invented urgency, or language implying a house is about to fail based on a photograph.
  • "Earthquake-proof," "guaranteed dry forever," or any promise that a building will survive a specific event.
  • Claims that we are Seattle's largest, oldest, or best, since none of those are verifiable.
  • Invented ratings, fabricated reviews, or testimonials attributed to customers who did not write them. Where illustrative text appears in place of real reviews, it is labelled.
  • Address-level or neighbourhood-level risk scores. A mapped designation describes regional conditions at map scale; it does not predict what a specific house will do, and absence from a mapped area is not proof of safety.
  • Universal rules that do not survive contact with real buildings, such as crack-width severity tables or blanket statements that every home built before a given year is unbolted.

How images are used

Where we do not have a real project photograph with permission, we use clearly illustrative images and label them as such. Illustrative images are never presented as actual employees, customers, completed projects, testimonials, or before-and-after evidence. Real before-and-after comparisons, when we publish them, use consistent viewpoints and identify the follow-up date, because a photo taken the day a job finished says nothing about how it performs in ten years.

Review and updating

Pages are reviewed against their primary sources before publication, and permit guidance is re-checked before we describe a current process, because jurisdictions change their instructions. We update the displayed date only after a meaningful review, not to manufacture freshness.

If you find something on this site that is wrong, out of date, or overstated, tell us through the contact page and we will correct it.

Emergencies are not a content problem

If a structure is actively moving or a slope presents an immediate hazard, that is an emergency. Move away from the affected area and contact emergency services. A quote form is not an emergency response service, and no guide on this site is a substitute for getting away from a failing structure.

Next step

Questions about something we published?

We would rather be corrected than cited incorrectly. Send the page and the concern and we'll review it against the source.

Free preliminary project review. Any charge for an on-site evaluation is explained before booking.

Request a Quote